• Winzip Online

WinZip is a full-featured compression utility offering a powerful and intuitive interface, fully integrated local and cloud file management, better compression ratios, strong encryption and much more functionality than Compressed Folders in Windows operating systems. Compressed folders only provides basic zipping and unzipping features. You can compare the difference between WinZip and Compressed Folders as you would the difference between WordPad and Word or WordPerfect. Windows operating systems have traditionally shipped with WordPad, a program that can handle basic word processing tasks. However, almost everyone uses a more full-featured word processing application. Here is list of features in WinZip (it is not a complete list) that have no equivalents in Windows Compressed Folders. Remove personal information from pictures and document files where they are stored or as they are added to a Zip file.

Convert photos to a different file type where they are stored or as they are added to a Zip file. Unzip Zip files to set locations or one you choose by means of a prompt as you open the Zip file. Tab view in file pane; open, view, and manage different folders at the same time in the Files pane, each on its own tab. Tree view option for Files pane; move into the file management view and use the tree view to find and work with files quickly. Quickly unzip and then delete Zip files using 'Replace Zip files with Zip content' on the context menu.

Compare WinZip vs. The result is that PKZIP is better. See the differences below. GZIP (.gz,.tar.gz. Which is better, 7-zip. WinRAR and WinZip to compress and extract. 7-ZIP allows you to. There are better alternatives such as 7-zip which doesn't. BetterZip: the most advanced zip and rar archiver for file compression, encryption. BetterZip makes it easy to work with zip, rar, 7-zip, tar, and xz files and it.

Select files and/or folders, right click, and select 'Create Split Zip file' to avoid having to create a whole, single Zip file first. Use Zipx with your MP3 files to compress them up to 20%. Use the WinZip Emailer with its Contacts feature to sync and combine your address books for easy use of email features in WinZip. With WinZip Enterprise, configured correctly in an App Rule, you can achieve full support of your Windows Information Protection (WIP) policy. WinZip Background Tools will alert you about files that can be deleted from a number of specific areas, such as the Temp folder; you can also choose to securely wipe the files. Use the WinZip Pro Scan and Share feature to scan your documents and/or pictures, zip them, save them, and/or share them; supported conversions can be used while zipping as well. Robust file management features: wipe deleted files and folders, restore accidentally deleted files, copy a path or cloud link to the clipboard, and more.

With WinZip Pro, the new Previewer displays pictures and, when expanded, will display other file contents as well, giving editing and sharing options for the file right in the preview pane. Touch-friendly user interface. With WinZip Pro you can create jobs that will backup files you have stored in a cloud service. Convert documents to the PDF format while they are added to Zip files.

Protect picture files by adding a watermark to them as they are added to Zip files. Unzip multiple archive files using the context menu (right click) now includes 7Z, CAB, ISO, IMG, LHA, LZH and RAR as well as ZIP and ZIPX. Send much larger Zip files to others using ZipShare and other cloud services. Enjoy the benefits of a true 64-bit version of WinZip. Faster zipping with multi-processor support in compression algorithms. Encrypt your data using AES encryption. Note: The Windows Compressed Folders feature has no facility for providing any encryption.

Use the Zip and E-Mail feature, even with webmail accounts, to easily compress and email files - if these are JPG files, you will also have the option to resize the photos for significant file size reduction. Create smaller Zip files (.zipx) using advanced compression methods like MP3, XZ, LZMA, PPMd, bzip2, WAVPACK, and JPEG. Create self-extracting Zip files that can be unzipped by users who don't have a Zip utility. Split large Zip files into smaller segments for emailing, etc. Use the WinZip Command Line Support Add-on, free to registered users of WinZip, which lets you work with Zip files from the command line or a batch file.

Display thumbnail images of JPG, GIF, BMP and other graphic files in Zip files without first having to extract the files. Support the use of.all. international and special characters. Compressed Folders can only handle a few (DOS characters). Use the Unzip and Try feature for examining the Zip file contents on a temporary basis. Open other popular archive types including RAR, ISO, 7z, TAR, GZ, BZ2, LHA, CAB and self-extractors.

Create Zip files greater than 4GB and/or Zip files with more than 65535 files. Use the Job Wizard function (in WinZip Pro) to automate the process of creating and updating Zip files. WinZip Jobs are great for your repetitive zipping tasks, letting you specify what files you want zipped, how you want them zipped, and where the resulting Zip files should be saved. Upload Zip files to FTP (with WinZip Pro). Windows Compressed Folders was introduced with Windows XP in October 2001. The fact that millions of users continue to download WinZip each month is probably the best evidence that the power and usability of WinZip makes it a very practical and attractive tool. We feel confident that most WinZip users, after comparing the features of WinZip with those of Windows Compressed Folders, will continue to make WinZip their compression utility of choice.

This article was: How to open the About WinZip dialog How to specify the correct program for Make.EXE.

I conducted a highly unscientific experiment. It's only 1 sample, but it's interesting nonetheless. I compressed two files. One is 109,369,344 B (.mp3) and the other is 1,230 B (.txt).

Add them up and you get 109,370,574 B. I used WinRAR 3.50 to make a.rar file. It took about 2 minutes to do and the final size is 109,342,218 B. The.mp3 went from 109,369,344 to 109,341,368. The.txt went from 1,230 to 695.

I guess the rest of the file size is overhead. I then used WinZip 9.0 SR-1 to make a.zip file.

It took about 20 sec. To do and the final size is 109,147,612 B. The.mp3 went from 109,369,344 to 109,146,688. The.txt went from 1,230 to 662. I guess the rest of the file size is overhead.

So the.zip file is much faster and is even slightly more efficient from this one experiment I conducted. I thought.rar was supposed to be superior, at least for compression.

What are your thoughts? Edit: I used an optimized compression setting for WinZip but not for WinRAR. So after tweaking WinRAR's compression to 'Best', I observed the following results. T took about 2 min.

10 sec., to do and the final size is 109,331,174 B. Mikey dread african anthem. The.mp3 went from 109,369,344 to 109,330,414. The.txt went from 1,230 to 605. I guess the rest of the file size is overhead. But WinRAR, while slightly more efficient in compression, takes much longer to compress. Click to expand.Oops, good point.

I forgot to mention the compression I used. With WinZip, I used 'Maximum (portable)'. With WinRAR, I used the default 'Normal'.

I just reran the experiment for WinRAR and set the compression method to 'Best'. It took about 2 min. 10 sec., to do and the final size is 109,331,174 B.

The.mp3 went from 109,369,344 to 109,330,414. The.txt went from 1,230 to 605. I guess the rest of the file size is overhead. So the compression now is a little better than what WinZip gives.

However, it takes much longer to compress via WinRAR than it does via WinRAR. We're talking 20 sec.mp3 files are already largely compressed. Same with most popular movie formats.

And depending on the compression type used, compressing your already-compressed files will do very little at best, and even make the archive file bigger at worst. Really, there is no advantage to be seen from archive-compressing a movie, a MP3 or a photo for that matter.

To me, what makes ZIPping or RARing files handy is if you want to take several files - an entire album for instance - and make an easily managed single file for transfer. At the other end you will still have to extract the files to use them, but it makes it much simpler to download one file (the.rar) rather than several. Compression like RAR and ZIP don't work too well on already compressed media formats like images, audio, and video as DevilDoc has said. ZIP is decent, but there are much better compressors out there. I typically use bzip2 (based on Burrows Wheeler Transform algorithm) with high compression, but it's also more CPU intensive than something like zip or gzip (fast LZW algorithm based) generally. There's also highly specialized compressors like rzip, which has a 900 MB lookahead, but it also requires a lot of RAM while compressing. Perhaps it's even better than WinHUA.

Winzip Online

RAR itself can compress pretty well, but I have no clue what algorithm they're using in there since it's proprietary. It could be a specialized PPM (partial pattern matching) algorithm for all I know. I should mention why I compressed the MP3 file. I did so b/c I. I normally distribute them as.mp3. However, I was submitting my mix to a site that plays such mixes on a rotational basis.

I have to submit the files via an anonymous FTP server that only allows uploads but no downloads. The owner of that server said that he only accepts.zip and.rar files. Furthermore, he wanted a.txt file that briefly described the mix. Therefore, I had to compress my MP3 along w/ the text file and create a.zip or.rar file. So for the heck of it, I got curious and wanted to see if WinRAR was so much better than WinZip that most techies make it out to be. While compression was similar, the discrepancy in time it took to execute their respective algorithms (I have a stock AMD 3200+ Venice w/ 2 GB RAM, FWIW) was astonishing.

I've also read that.rar files are less likely to become corrupt than.zip files, but there's no easy quantifiable way to support or rebuke that claim like there is for actual file size and execution time. Click to expand.Thanks for running the experiment. The big discrepancy in execution time (favoring WinZip) does not surprise me. But what does is that WinRAR could not outperform WinZip. Granted, the video file is already fairly compressed. BTW, did you keep the default compression settings or set them both to 'best' or 'maximum'?

The next experiment I'm curious to do (if I get around to running it) is to take several compressable files, such as text files and random Microsoft Office documents, and compress them via WinRAR and WinZip. That might yield additional clues.